ED.TV Productions

To speak truth, we seek truth.

Operation Lockstep: Predictive Programming

Operation Lockstep was an article found inside a document released by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010. 

It reads like a script, detailing the rise and spread of a global pandemic. It is described as an ‘Academic Scenario’ which is in actuality a detailed plan of a universal scale crime, dressed up to look like help.

The 2010 Rockefeller published article of ‘Scenario Narratives’ is a frightening read and the internet has doubted the credibility of it, suggesting it is nothing other than a Pied Piper psychological operation to discourage the belief that the Corona Virus is a staged operation in order for the global cabal to gain even more control over the citizens of the world and to add tighter measures to keep tabs on every person on the planet.

In actuality it’s not too dissimilar to life after the fall of the Twin Towers, where huge security measures were implemented which at the time seemed far fetched but we now all live under these ‘safety’ measures now with full acceptance that this is the ‘new normal’, exactly the same is happening right now.

‘A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback’

This is the opening quote from the article and spells out exactly what the agenda will be tailored towards and how a world scale pandemic will kick off the proceedings.

The piece is written as an imagined scenario, and could be the most incredible coincidence, but in reality the Rockefeller bloodline is one which has had a hidden hand in shaping the society we live in for such a long time now that the article should’ve been received as a piece of predictive programming. 

Many investigative journalists tried to bring this piece forward and suggest that it was something to worry about, especially as this isn’t the first time the draconian elite have spelt out what they plan to do before they carry it out.

To use the Twin Towers as an example again, there were many televised ‘programmes’ that repeatedly spoke of a terrorist attack on the Twin Towers but the information was of course received as entertainment only, regardless of the fact that this happened time and time again. (Predictive Programming and the numbing of human emotions to such a traumatic event, makes the real thing easier to accept).

Operation Lockstep reads like a blue print for the Corona pandemic, suggesting that the eventuality of Martial Law could be a very real and necessary thing if the world was to be triggered by a virus. 

The essential point of the article is that without an authoritarian government a virus such as the Corona Virus would uncontrollably spread and endanger the entire population of the world. This means that citizens lose more of their rights and the government is the only entity capable of making decisions of how lives should be lived. 

‘The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.’

The Rockefeller foundation took the time in the imagined scenario to praise the communist ways of China, suggesting that through a pandemic they would fare well due to the extent of control the government already had over it’s citizens.

The scary thing is that the ‘imagined scenario’ plays out almost scene by scene in terms of how China responded to the virus.

‘The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. 

However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post pandemic recovery.

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. 

Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.’

The article has encapsulated our current reality perfectly and the position we are in is apparently crying out for the ‘great reset’ so we can ‘build back better’ and accept our ‘new normal’. 

One of the most haunting things about the document is that it came from the Rockefeller family, who are huge financers of The World Economic Forum and have also shown huge interests in eugenics for the last century, not only that but also have a penchant for bio-warfare techniques as well as methods for population control.         

Is this a case of a mathematically improbable coincidence, or is this credible confirmation that the group of elitists that the Rockefeller family belong to have a very sinister plan to impose their ‘new world order’ upon us?

You only need to look at how far we have allowed it to come in terms of how restricted we are already to make up your mind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *